SAMPAT KAKASAHEB KARDILE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Judgment
Cause title
SAMPAT KAKASAHEB KARDILE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 403 OF 2019
Mr. S. S. Ghate, Advocate for Applicant.
Mrs. V. S. Choudhari, APP for Respondent – State. ...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ. DATE : 29th November, 2023
ORDER :-
. It appears that the present application is the second application. The earlier application, when learned Advocate for the applicant prayed for withdrawal of the same, was disposed of as withdrawn after disinclination was shown by this Court to grant any relief in respect of suspension of sentence to the applicants. There is no change in circumstance except change in Advocate and, therefore, the present application is not maintainable. Hence, Criminal Application No.3979 of 2023 stands rejected. [1] 904-appln-3979-2023.odt
Learned Advocate for the applicant now prays for expediting the appeal, however, at present this Court is dealing with the jail appeals of the year 2016, 2017 and 2018. This appeal is of the year 2019 and, therefore, no preference can be given.
Since the arguable points are made, appeal stands admitted.
Issue notice to the respondent. Learned APP waives notice for the respondent – State. Call record and proceedings.
Matter to come up as per its turn. [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE ] JUDGE [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE [2]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.