✦ Bombay High Court · 22 Jun 2026

SYED RUBABEE SYED KASAM v. THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD & Ors.

Wp No. 752 of 2007ABHAY S WAGHWASE, SMS ABHAY S WAGHWASE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of above, these writ petitions are disposed off as

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 31 WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2007 SYED RUBABEE SYED KASAM VERSUS THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS .… Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State Ms Anagha Pandit h/f Mr. S. B. Talekar, Advocate for Respondent No.4 .… WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3929 OF 2007 SANJAY VITHALRAO JADHAV VERSUS THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS .… Mr. Y. V. Kakade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State Mr. N. J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for Respondent No.3 .… WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 764 OF 2007 MOHSIN ABDUL KABIR BAGESH VERSUS THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS .… Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State Mr. N. J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Ms Anagha Pandit h/f Mr. S. B. Talekar, Advocate for Respondent No.4 31-WP-752-2007++ .… CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. DATE : June 22, 2026 PER COURT :-

1.

Ms. Anagha Pandit, learned counsel, makes a statement that these petitions have become infructuous. She therefore urges that the same be disposed off.

Operative part

2.

In view of above, these writ petitions are disposed off as infructuous. SMS [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ] 2 of 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of above, these writ petitions are disposed off as

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 22 Jun 2026. The bench was ABHAY S WAGHWASE, SMS ABHAY S WAGHWASE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wp No. 752 of 2007). ← Search more judgments