✦ Bombay High Court · 23 Feb 2012

Narayan Prasad Sethi & Anr. v. Chotelal s

Writ Petition No. 8841 of 2011R M BORDE

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.8841 OF 2011 Narayan Prasad Sethi & another Petitioners Versus Chotelal s/o Puransing Arora & others Respondents Mr. A.S.Bajaj, advocate with Mr.P.D.Bachate, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Kazi, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.C.Arora, advocate for Respondents No.2 & 3. Mr.K.S.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.4. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE: 23rd February, 2012. PER COURT: Learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate forum for ventilating their grievances raised in the petition. Leave granted. Petition stands rejected as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. adb/wp884111 R.M.BORDE JUDGE

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Why is this linked?

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 8841 of 2011). ← Search more judgments