Shivshankar Basappa Tonshal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Maharashtra, this Petition is disposed of with a direction to the said
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
.... Mr. R.P. Sabban for the Petitioner. Mr. V.P. Malvankar, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. .... CORAM : KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 23rd March, 2006. P.C. : In view of the statement that the application dated 9th March , 2005 filed by the Petitioner is pending before the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra, this Petition is disposed of with a direction to the said authority that the said authority shall decide the application dated 9th March, 2005 made under Section 50 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 after giving to the Petitioner as well as the concerned parties an opportunity of being heard. The appropriate authority shall decide the same within eight weeks 2 of the Petitioner placing a certified copy of this order before it and shall also communicate the decision to the concerned parties within two weeks thereafter. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Maharashtra, this Petition is disposed of with a direction to the said
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — s. 50.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.