IN APEALST/7541/2023 v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Application stands allowed and disposed of
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 302
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Since 27.11.2021 to 23.02.2023 i.e. till the pronouncement of judgment, the appellant was in jail and thereafter, after his conviction, he is [1] 918-appln-2721-2023.odt still in jail and therefore, for the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned.
Judgment
... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. P. Deshmukh h/f Mr. Deshmukh Sachin S. APP for Respondent – State : Mr. A. M. Phule … CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ. DATE : 11th October, 2023. ORDER :- . Present application has been filed for getting the delay of 92 days condoned in filing the criminal appeal. The appellant is the original accused in Sessions Case No.33 of 2022, who has been held guilty on
23.02.2023 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir for committing offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code.
#2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Aashish P. Deshmukh holding for learned Advocate Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh for the applicant and learned APP Mr. A. M. Phule for respondent – State.
#3. Since 27.11.2021 to 23.02.2023 i.e. till the pronouncement of judgment, the appellant was in jail and thereafter, after his conviction, he is [1] 918-appln-2721-2023.odt still in jail and therefore, for the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned.
#4. Application stands allowed and disposed of.
#5. Registry to verify and register the appeal. [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE ] JUDGE [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE [2]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application stands allowed and disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 302.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 11 Oct 2023. The bench was ANWADI, ABHAY S WAGHWASE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.