✦ Bombay High Court · 21 Mar 2023

Balasaheb Genaba Kingare v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Interim Application No. 204 of 2023ABHAY S WAGHWASE, SUNIL B SHUKRE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, Interim Application stands dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. We find that whatever statements which have been made by Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, which in the opinion of the Applicant are objectionable, have not been considered either by the Trial Court or by this Court while arriving at final conclusions in this…
  • Para 33. Hence, Interim Application stands dismissed. (ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Sneha Chavan page 2 of 2

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 204 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1041 OF 2021 Balasaheb Genaba Kingare V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Applicant ..Respondents ---- Mr. Balasaheb Geneba Kingare, Applicant party in person. Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondents/State. Mr. Nitesh Bhutekar a/w Aniket Nargare for Respondent No.3. ---- CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE, AND ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ. DATE : 21st MARCH 2023 P.C.

1.

It is the contention of the Applicant/Appellant that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have made a wrong statement before this Court in respect of non attachment of property. The Applicant appears in person and, therefore, he seeks a direction of this Court for initiating criminal proceedings against the Respondents for committing the offence of willful disobedience of order of this Court and also knowingly making false statement on oath, with a view to procure legal orders from this Court. Sneha Chavan page 1 of 2 15 ia 204-23=.doc

2.

We find that whatever statements which have been made by Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, which in the opinion of the Applicant are objectionable, have not been considered either by the Trial Court or by this Court while arriving at final conclusions in this matter. Therefore, there is no merit in the interim application.

Operative part

3.

Hence, Interim Application stands dismissed. (ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Sneha Chavan page 2 of 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, Interim Application stands dismissed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 21 Mar 2023. The bench was ABHAY S WAGHWASE, SUNIL B SHUKRE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Interim Application No. 204 of 2023). ← Search more judgments