✦ Bombay High Court

THE STATE OF MAH v. LAXMANBUWAS GUIRU KISHANBUWA

Ca No. 13372 of 2010KISHORE C SANT3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Mr. Yadav, learned AGP submits that above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by Government Resolution No. Sankirna- 2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03-11-2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23-02-2017 and 13-08-2018 to the said Government Resolution. Hence, the group of appeals can be withdrawn as per…
  • Para 44. However, before disposing off the appeals, it is further ( 4 ) fa2833.13. clarified that in case the amount is not deposited as per the award, the State Government undertakes to deposit the said amount within a period of one year in the concerned…

Judgment

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. VERSUS BHIMAO ANANDRAO DHONDE AND ORS. AND 38 FIRST APPEAL NO.88 OF 2015 WITH CA/13372/2010 IN FA/87/2015 WITH CA/13370/2010 IN FA/88/2015 WITH FA/87/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS JAGANNATH RAMKRISHNA PAWAR AND ANR AND 40 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2569 OF 2010 IN FAST/1240/2010 WITH CA/2570/2010 IN FAST/1240/2010 THE STAEE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS BAJIRAO GOVIND BANGAR AND ORS AND 41 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2571 OF 2010 IN FAST/1270/2010 WITH CA/2572/2010 IN FAST/1270/2010 ( 2 ) fa2833.13. THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR VERSUS KASHINATH MAHADA BANGAR AND ORS AND 44 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11806 OF 2010 IN FAST/20591/2010 WITH CA/11801/2010 IN FAST/20647/2010 WITH CA/11808/2010 IN FAST/20643/2010 WITH CA/11802/2010 IN FAST/20646/2010 WITH CA/11803/2010 IN FAST/20646/2010 WITH CA/11809/2010 IN FAST/20643/2010 WITH CA/11804/2010 IN FAST/20645/2010 WITH CA/11805/2010 IN FAST/20645/2010 WITH CA/11807/2010 IN FAST/20591/2010 WITH CA/11800/2010 IN FAST/20647/2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS BABURAO GENAJI BANGAR AND ORS AND 45 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13363 OF 2010 IN FAST/24291/2010 WITH CA/13366/2010 IN FAST/24272/2010 WITH CA/13364/2010 IN FAST/24291/2010 WITH CA/13365/2010 IN FAST/24272/2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS RAGHUNATH BHAU HINGE ... Mr. S. R. Yadav, AGP for the appellants Mr. D. R. Jaybhar, Advocate for the respondents in respective matters.

O R D E R (12th NOVEMBER, 2022) Civil Application for condonation of delay:-

1. Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the application ( 3 ) fa2833.13. and as the parties are arrived at amicable settlement, it is desirable to condone the delay, the delay stands condoned. The civil applications for condonation of delay in respective matters, stand disposed off. Office to register the appeals. Appeals-

1.

These appeals are placed before us in today’s National Lok- Adalat. Mr. P. S. Mengshetti, Dy. Collector, Latur & Mr. Vishwas Shirsath, SLAO, Ambajogai, Dist. Beed are present.

2.

Mr. Yadav, learned AGP submits that above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by Government Resolution No. Sankirna- 2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03-11-2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23-02-2017 and 13-08-2018 to the said Government Resolution. Hence, the group of appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals.

3.

The learned AGP states that entire amount in these appeals has been deposited and later-on the said amount has been withdrawn by the original claimants by obtaining orders from this court. He submits that in these circumstances nothing survived in these appeals.

4.

However, before disposing off the appeals, it is further ( 4 ) fa2833.13. clarified that in case the amount is not deposited as per the award, the State Government undertakes to deposit the said amount within a period of one year in the concerned Reference Court. If the amount is not withdrawn by the claimants/respondents, same is allowed to be withdrawn and office to allow withdrawal. If the said amount is not deposited, they are at liberty to withdraw the same after the amount is deposited.

Operative part

7.

The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The court fee refund certificate be issued as per the provisions under the of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959.

8.

In view of withdrawal of these appeals, pending civil applications, if any stand disposed off. [A. R. BORULKAR] Advocate Member [S. G. SHETE] DJ (Retd.) Member [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Head of Panel VishalK/fa2833.13.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Fees Act, 1959.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Ca No. 13372 of 2010). ← Search more judgments