GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEV CORP v. PANDHARI SAMBA PARGE & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Learned advocate for the acquiring body/Officer submits that above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03-11-2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23-02-2017 and 13- 08-2018 to the said Government Resolution. Hence, the group of appeals can be withdrawn…
- Para 44. However, before disposing off the appeals, it is further clarified that in case the amount is not deposited as per the award, the State Government undertakes to deposit the said amount within a period of six months in the concerned Reference Court. If the…
Judgment
93 FIRST APPEAL NO.2372 OF 2021 WITH CA/2841/2017 IN FA/2372/2021 WITH FA/2376/2021 WITH CA/2845/2017 IN FA/2376/2021 WITH FA/2375/2021 WITH CA/2847/2017 IN FA/2375/2021 WITH FA/2377/2021 WITH CA/2849/2017 IN FA/2377/2021 WITH FA/2374/2021 WITH CA/2851/2017 IN FA/2374/2021 WITH FA/2373/2021 WITH CA/2843/2017 IN FA/2373/2021 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LOWER TERNA PROJECT DIV., LATUR THR EXE. ENGINEER, LATUR AND ANR VERSUS SHIVKANTH SHRIMANTHAPPA TUGAVE AND 94 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5984 OF 2020 IN FAST/12682/2019 WITH CA/5986/2020 IN FAST/12682/2019 WITH CA/5985/2020 IN FAST/12682/2019 G.M.I.D.C., THR THE EX. ENGINEER, LATUR MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION AND ANR VERSUS GOPINATH NARAYAN DHOBLE (DIED) GAYABAI (DIED) THR LRSUMAKANT AND ANR ... Mr.T. B. Bhosale, advocate for the appellants in respective matters Mr. Ashwin Sakolkar, Advocate with Mr. H. B. Nandagavale, Advocate h/ f Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the respondent No.1 in Sr. No.94 Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for the respondents/State Mr. Shirish Sangle, Advocate for the appellant in Sr. No. 92 & 93 Mr. N. H. Kulkarni, (GMIDC Latur), Sub-Divisional Engineer, Latur is present
O R D E R (11th FEBRUARY, 2023) Civil Applications for delay:-
1. Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the applications ( 3 ) fa3702.08 and as the parties have arrived at amicable settlement, it is desirable to condone the delay. The delay stands condoned. The civil applications for condonation of delay, if any stand allowed and disposed off. Office to register the appeals. First Appeals:-
These matters are placed before us in today’s National Lok- Adalat. N. H. Kulkarni (GMIDC Latur), Suv-Divisional Engineer, Latur is present.
Learned advocate for the acquiring body/Officer submits that above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03-11-2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23-02-2017 and 13- 08-2018 to the said Government Resolution. Hence, the group of appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals.
The learned AGP states that entire amount in these appeals has been deposited and later-on the said amount has been withdrawn by the original claimants by obtaining orders from this court. He submits that in these circumstances nothing survives in these appeals. ( 4 ) fa3702.08
However, before disposing off the appeals, it is further clarified that in case the amount is not deposited as per the award, the State Government undertakes to deposit the said amount within a period of six months in the concerned Reference Court. If the amount is not deposited within six weeks, then it shall carry the interest in terms of Section 28 or 34 of the Act, as the case may be. If the amount is not withdrawn by the claimants/respondents, same is allowed to be withdrawn and office to allow withdrawal. If the said amount is not deposited, they are at liberty to withdraw the same after the amount is deposited.
Operative part
The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The court fee refund certificate be issued as per the provisions under the of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959.
In view of withdrawal of these appeals, pending civil applications, if any stand disposed off. [A. R. BORULKAR] Advocate Member [S. G. SHETE] DJ (Retd.) Member [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Head of Panel VishalK/fa3702.08
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Fees Act, 1959.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.