✦ Bombay High Court · 19 Oct 2011

Balasaheb Tatyabhau Tonde v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

M T JOSHI, B R GAVAI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 49 OF 2011 " Balaji @ Balasaheb Tatyabhau Tonde Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. " Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Anil M. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 to 9. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 19TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The petition has served its purpose. The Gram Sabha concerned has passed a resolution. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the petition. The same is disposed of as such. In so far as the grievance of the intervenors is concerned, they would be at liberty to take recourse to such remedy, as is available to them under the provisions of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Needless to state that the orders passed in the present petition would not come in the way of the decision of the proceedings filed by the petitioner. grt/- [M.T. JOSHI,J.]

[B.R. GAVAI, J.]

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 19 Oct 2011. The bench was M T JOSHI, B R GAVAI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments