Laxmanrao Shetkar v. APPLICANTVERSUSThe State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Civil applications are disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The appeals arise out of acquisition proceedings. For the reasons given in the application, we condone thedelay. The Civil applications are disposed of. (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) (R.G. AVACHAT, J.) fmp/-
Judgment
Cause title
C.A. No.14156/2018 withconnected C.As.:: 1 ::IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14156 OF 2018
INFIRST APPEAL ST. NO.14638 OF 2012
Samb s/o Laxmanrao Shetkar… APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.… RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for applicantMr. A.D. Wange, A.G.P. for respondent No.1Mr. S.G. Sangle, Advocate for respondent No.2.....…WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9246 OF 2018
INFIRST APPEAL ST. NO.14709 OF 2012
Yusufoddin Jamiroddin Kazi… APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.… RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for applicantMr. A.D. Wange, A.G.P. for respondent No.1Mr. S.G. Sangle, Advocate for respondent No.2.....…WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14157 OF 2018
INFIRST APPEAL ST. NO.14697 OF 2012
C.A. No.14156/2018 withconnected C.As.:: 2 ::Manmath Madhavrao Wadkar… APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.… RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for applicantMr. A.D. Wange, A.G.P. for respondent No.1Mr. S.G. Sangle, Advocate for respondent No.2.....…WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14158 OF 2018
INFIRST APPEAL ST. NO.14683 OF 2012
Motiram Shivling Wadkar… APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.… RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for applicantMr. A.D. Wange, A.G.P. for respondent No.1Mr. S.G. Sangle, Advocate for respondent No.2.....…WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14159 OF 2018
INFIRST APPEAL ST. NO.14687 OF 2012
Ganesh Manmath Wadkar… APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.… RESPONDENTS
C.A. No.14156/2018 withconnected C.As.:: 3 ::.......
Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for applicantMr. A.D. Wange, A.G.P. for respondent No.1Mr. S.G. Sangle, Advocate for respondent No.2.....
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT ANDNEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.DATE : 28th JUNE, 2024
O R D E R :
Heard learned Advocate Mr. Patil for the applicants. Learned A.G.P. waives service for respondent No.1 State andlearned Advocate Mr. Sangle waives service for respondentNo.2.
The applicants have preferred first appeals againstthe judgment and order/ award dated 16/12/2011, passed bythe Reference Court. Since there is delay of 06 days in filingeach appeal, these applications are preferred for condonationof delay. The applicants have stated the reasons for the delayin paragraph No.5 of the applications, which are as follows :-
The applicants say that, they have forwarded thenecessary documents to the Advocate within timebut due to some family function of the Advocateand thereafter because of the death of the uncle ofthe Advocate on 28/05/2012, it was not possiblefor the Advocate to file the appeal within theprescribed time of limitation.
C.A. No.14156/2018 withconnected C.As.:: 4 ::
Learned Advocate for respondent No.2 fairlysubmits that this Court can consider the applications. LearnedA.G.P. submits that, appropriate orders be passed.
Operative part
The appeals arise out of acquisition proceedings. For the reasons given in the application, we condone thedelay. The Civil applications are disposed of. (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) (R.G. AVACHAT, J.) fmp/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.