Dhananjay Baburao Mahajan v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 s. 145(1A)
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3406 OF 2008
Dhananjay Baburao Mahajan
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others APPELLANT RESPONDENTS ....
Mr. D.P. Palodkar, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, A.G.P. for the respondent/State. Mr. U.B. Bondar, advocate for the respondent No. 4. Mr. K.F. Shingare, advocate for the respondent Nos. 8 to 11. ....
CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 23rd JUNE, 2011
ORAL ORDER :
The appeal has become infructuous since the issue involved in the present appeal was in respect of the order dated 9th May, 2008 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, dissolving the Village Panchayat under Section 145 (1A) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The appeal is dismissed as infructuous. (2) lpa122-08 In view of dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal, the Civil Application No. 7774/2008 stands dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] NPJ/lpa122-08
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 — s. 145(1A).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 23 Jun 2011. The bench was NISHITA MHATRE, M T JOSHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.