Vinayak Uttamrao Banchod & Ors. v. Manisha Varma & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of compliance of the order, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.19 OF 2022
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3498 OF 2008
Vinayak Uttamrao Banchod and Others PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Manisha Varma and Others RESPONDENTS
Mr. Vivek J. Dhage, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondent - State ....… ....... [
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. J.] DATE : 2 nd JULY, 2025
ORDER :
By placing order dated 13th May, 2025 on record, learned AGP submits that the order is complied with. Learned Advocate for the Petitioners confirms the said position. The order is marked “X” for identification.
In view of compliance of the order, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.