Writ Petition No. 1645 of 2009 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 05 Feb 2010
- Bench
- S S SHINDE, A M KHANWILKAR
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in the present Petition and the same is disposed off, with liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the decision taken by the Authority, in the event the same is adverse to the Petitioner. That challenge…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1645 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2010.
The relief claimed in this Petition is to direct the Respondent No.3 to decide the objections raised by the Petitioner before taking any action under Section 210 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.
Counsel for the Respondent No.3, on instructions, states that the objections have already been decided and the decision taken by the Authority will be 2 Court’s or Judge’s Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Registrar’s orders. communicated to the Petitioner forthwith. That in any case, be done within TWO WEEKS from today.
In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in the present Petition and the same is disposed off, with liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the decision taken by the Authority, in the event the same is adverse to the Petitioner. That challenge will be considered on its own merits. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] [A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.] asb/FEB10/wp1645.09
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — s. 210.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 05 Feb 2010. The bench was S S SHINDE, A M KHANWILKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.