✦ Bombay High Court · 23 Jan 2008

M/s.VLT Cargo Movers Pvt.Ltd v. Ajitkumar S. Puri & Anr.

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The petitioner is permitted to deposit a sum of Rs.3.00 lakh instead of furnishing bank guarantee for the like amount as was ordered in terms of paragraph 4 of the order dated 11th January 2008. The said order is further modified to the extent…

Judgment

Ms.B.B.Dholakia for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 23rd January 2008 PC :

#1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. By consent heard counsel for the parties forthwith.

#2. The petitioner is permitted to deposit a sum of Rs.3.00 lakh instead of furnishing bank guarantee for the like amount as was ordered in terms of paragraph 4 of the order dated 11th January 2008. The said order is further modified to the extent that the amount so deposited by the petitioner be invested in appropriate fixed deposit scheme to earn best interest returns, in ((-2-)) MST any nationalised bank to be kept alive till disposal of the petition. It is further ordered that in the event the respondent succeeds in the present petition, will be entitled to withdraw such amount as may be ordered by this Court including interest to be awarded to the respondent on the outstanding amount in addition to such further amount to be paid by the petitioner as per order to be passed by the Court. Undertaking be filed within one week. Motion disposed off on the above terms. . Rest of the order dated 11th January, 2008 to remain as it is. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 6 of 2008). ← Search more judgments