✦ Bombay High Court · 30 Nov 2009

Suman Goel v. Apurva Shah

S C DHARMADHIKARNI

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Motion is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh one as and when occasion arises. (S. C. Dharmadhikari, J.)

Judgment

..Plaintiff. ..Deft. AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3951 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2177 OF 2009 Gimni Devi Goel. v/s. Quest Capital Advisory Pvt. Ltd. ..Plaintiff. ..Deft. AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3952 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2176 OF 2009 Sarla Goel v/s. Apurva Shah. ..Plaintiff. ..Deft. Rashmi Goel. v/s. Apurva Shah. AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3954 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2166 OF 2009 ..Plaintiff. ..Deft. AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3958 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2150 OF 2009 Neeta Goel. ..Plaintiff. v/s. Apurva Shah. ..Deft. 1 ------ Sanjay Jain a/w Darshan Mehta i/b Druve Liladhar & Co., for the plaintiffs. Zal Andhyarujina i/b Juris Matrix for defts. -------- CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARNI, J. DATE : 30th November 2009. P. C. :

1.

Motion is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh one as and when occasion arises. (S. C. Dharmadhikari, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments