Ltd v. Dee Bee Films
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
In the light of the statement made, suit is allowed to be
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The plaintiff's advocate states that he has received instructions to withdraw the suit. In the light of the statement made, suit is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Refund of court fees as per rules. No order as to costs. (S. C.…
Judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. SUIT NO. 75 OF 1995 Famous Cine Laboratories and Studdios Ltd. v/s. Dee Bee Films. ..Defendant. ..Plaintiff. ------ R. K. Thakkar for polaintiff. Heetal Patel for deft -------- CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARNI, J. DATE : 30th November 2009. P. C. :
Operative part
The plaintiff's advocate states that he has received instructions to withdraw the suit. In the light of the statement made, suit is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Refund of court fees as per rules. No order as to costs. (S. C. Dharmadhikari, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the light of the statement made, suit is allowed to be
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 30 Nov 2009. The bench was S C DHARMADHIKARNI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.