✦ Bombay High Court

Dr.M.B.Rawate v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Applicant in-person is absent. Heard the learned Counsel Shri. Sanjay Udesi for the Respondents. Notice of Motion stands dismissed in default. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)

Judgment

Shri. Sanjay Udesi for the Respondents. ----- : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &&& CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:

#1. Applicant in-person is absent. Heard the learned Counsel Shri. Sanjay Udesi for the Respondents. Notice of Motion stands dismissed in default. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2814 of 1992). ← Search more judgments