NO. 562 OF 2003 COMPANY Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 5(2), Mumabi v. Jindal Iron and Steel Company Ltd. (JISCO) Mumbai
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S RADHAKRISHNAN S VAZIFDAR, S VAZIFDAR, S RADHAKRISHNAN
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. None appears for the Applicant. Shri. Mistry appears on behalf of the Respondent. The Notice of Motion stands dismissed in default. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)
Judgment
None for the Applicant Shri.J.D.Mistry i/b. Rajni Associates for the Respondent. .. Applicant .. Respondent CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &&& CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
None appears for the Applicant. Shri. Mistry appears on behalf of the Respondent. The Notice of Motion stands dismissed in default. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)
(S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.