OF 2005 SUIT NO.2468 OF 2005 SUITSUIT NO.2468 OF 2005 Wanbury Ltd v. Novartis A.G. Mr. Faisal Sayed i/by.D.H.Law Associates for & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. In view of the order of the Division Bench dated 10/8/2006 the Notice of Motion sought to be restored to file is to be heard on merits. It is not necessary therefore to pass any order on this Notice of Motion. Notice of Motion…
Judgment
Mr. Faisal Sayed i/by.D.H.Law Associates for the plaintiffs. Mr.D.D. Madon, Sr.Adv i/by.G.S. Hegde and V.A.Bhagat for defendant nos.1, 2 and 5. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. NOVEMBER 13, 2006. 13, 2006. NOVEMBER NOVEMBER 13, 2006. P.C. : : : P.C.P.C.
In view of the order of the Division Bench dated 10/8/2006 the Notice of Motion sought to be restored to file is to be heard on merits. It is not necessary therefore to pass any order on this Notice of Motion. Notice of Motion is accordingly
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.