✦ Bombay High Court · 19 Dec 2005

M/s Babulal Uttamchand and Co v. Mahanagar Gas Ltd

Arbitration Petition No. 419 of 2005DESHMUKH

Case at a glance

Decided
19 Dec 2005
Bench
DESHMUKH

Provisions considered

Judgment

The learned counsel appearing for respondents states that the Arbitrator has already been appointed. Statement is accepted. As the Arbitrator has already been appointed, all interim orders that are claimed in this petition can be claimed by the petitioners before the learned Arbitrator under section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. Therefore, this petition cannot be entertained. It is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Personal Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ----------------

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 17.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 19 Dec 2005. The bench was DESHMUKH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Arbitration Petition No. 419 of 2005). ← Search more judgments