✦ Bombay High Court

NO.438 NO.438 NO.438 OF OF OF M/s Arul Tech and Marketing Pvt.Ltd v. M/s Bharat Sanchan Nigam Ltd & Ors.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. The entire award turns on appreciation of evidence record. The findings recorded learned Arbitrator findings facts. In limited jurisdiction Court section 34 the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the award cannot be interfered with. Petition is rejected. :- . Parties to act on the…

Judgment

1.

The entire award turns on appreciation of evidence record. The findings recorded learned Arbitrator findings facts. In limited jurisdiction Court section 34 the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the award cannot be interfered with. Petition is rejected. :- . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ----------

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments