✦ Bombay High Court · 12 Jan 2005

National Association for the Blind & Ors. v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr.

S A BOBDE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The learned Counsel appearing for Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai has pointed out an affidavit dated 21st day of -2- December, 2004 filed by A.G. Hire, Deputy Municipal Commissioner of respondent No.1, in which it is mentioned that 3 per cent of the posts…

Judgment

Mr. Jamshed Mistry, instructed by Ms. Preeti Shah, for the petitioners. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Counsel, with Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No.1. Mr. A.A. Sayyed, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.2. S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE: JANUARY 12, 2005. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & P.C. This petition has been filed by the National Association for the Blind in which a prayer has been made that respondent No.1 has advertised on 21st/22nd August, 2004, inviting applications for 3433 posts and after being satisfied that proper reservation has not been made for the blind and partially sighted persons.

2.

The learned Counsel appearing for Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai has pointed out an affidavit dated 21st day of -2- December, 2004 filed by A.G. Hire, Deputy Municipal Commissioner of respondent No.1, in which it is mentioned that 3 per cent of the posts would be reserved for handicapped persons and out of that, one per cent has to be kept reserved for the blind or partially sighted persons. Mr. Singhvi, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.1, submits that Rules will be strictly complied with and he submits that 75 posts in various categories covering the G.R. dated 13-8-2004 and remaining vacancies in the posts identified by G.R. dated 13-8-2004 will be filled up and these vacancies will be advertised and posts will be filled up by proper procedure within four months. In view of this affidavit, nothing further survives in the petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to revive this petition, in case there is non-compliance of the order of this Court. This petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J. -3- -4-

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments