✦ Bombay High Court

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 5, Mumbai v. Vodafone Idea Ltd

Interim Application No. 1938 of 2026NEELA GOKHALE, G S KULKARNI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. We, accordingly, dispose of the proceedings as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant/appellant to file appropriate proceedings before the Delhi HighCourt. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open, including the benefit of Section 14 of Limitation Act, which may be available to…

Judgment

305, 317 & 318.IA1938_2026.DOCVidya AminIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1938 OF 2026ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 18895 OF 2024a/w.INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3423 OF 2026ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 18899 OF 2024a/w.INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3424 OF 2026ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 18904 OF 2024 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 5, Mumbai… Applicant/AppellantVs.Vodafone Idea Ltd.… Respondent _________Mr. Vikas T. Khanchandani for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Sachit Jolly, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Jitendra Singh, Shivali Mhatre and Rajesh Gaikwad for the respondent.__________CORAM:G. S. KULKARNI &DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATE:28 AUGUST, 2026.P.C.

1.

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, in view of the objection raised on behalf of the respondent, fairly states that the Interim Applications as also the Income-tax Appeals would be withdrawn and would be filed before the Delhi High Court.

2.

We, accordingly, dispose of the proceedings as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant/appellant to file appropriate proceedings before the Delhi HighCourt. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open, including the benefit of Section 14 of Limitation Act, which may be available to the applicant in taking further appropriate steps. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)Page 1 of 128 August, 2026

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Interim Application No. 1938 of 2026). ← Search more judgments