Rohan Raman Khopkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 s. 16
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In this view of the matter, further adjudication of this Petition is notcalled for. Let the orders be accordingly pronounced as stated before us. Page 1 of 2 Sairaj 303 WP-12720-2025.DOC4.All the contentions of the parties on the outcome of said proceedingsare expressly kept…
Judgment
303 WP-12720-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12720 OF 2025 Rohan Raman Khopkar ...PetitionerVersusThe State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents_______Mr. Divyesh Jain i/b Mr. Nitin Gaware Patil for Petitioner. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4._______CORAM:G. S. KULKARNI &AARTI SATHE, JJ.DATE:6th OCTOBER, 2025P.C.
This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed forlimited relief praying that the Petitioner’s Appeal filed under Section 14(1)(j-3) and read with Section 16 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 bedirected to be decided expeditiously.
It is informed by learned AGP appearing for Respondent-State that thehearing of Appeal was held on 23rd September, 2025 and the orders of the Appeal would soon be passed within period of one week from today. Weaccept the statement as made on behalf of Respondent.
Operative part
In this view of the matter, further adjudication of this Petition is notcalled for. Let the orders be accordingly pronounced as stated before us. Page 1 of 2 Sairaj 303 WP-12720-2025.DOC4.All the contentions of the parties on the outcome of said proceedingsare expressly kept open. 5. Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)Page 2 of 2 Sairaj
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 — s. 16.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.