Sharda Prasad Chaudhari v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Judgment
Mr. Rajesh Gehani, for the Petitioner Mr. M. More, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. G.D. Utangale, for respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I.F.I.F.I. REBELLO REBELLO &&& REBELLO ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . In our opinion the petitioners are members of the society, which is not made party to this petition. The grievance of the petitioners is that some persons who are eligible have not been admitted. If that be so, it is for those persons to pursue their legal remedy. The other grievance is that the society is not being registered. That issue can also be raised by the society. We find, therefore, no case for interference in the exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition disposed of. REBELLO, J.) (F.I.F.I.F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.