The State of Maharashtra v. Sumanbai Narhari Kokate )
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 24 Sep 2004
- Bench
- V G PALSHIKAR, ANOOP V MOHTA, V MOHTA, ANOOP
Judgment
Ms. P.H.Kantharia APP for the state. Ms. Revati Mohite -Dere for respondents. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED; 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATED; DATED; 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;
By appeal State challenge acquittal passed learned Judge appreciation evidence regarding unnatural victim, was wife accused no.1 daughter- -law accused nos.4
From appreciation evidence learned Judge apparent possible. But merely because possible cannot interfere a accepted learned Judge because neither purverse grossly inconsistance with the evidece on record so as to require interference. Hence appeal rejected. ....
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.