✦ Bombay High Court · 14 Oct 2010

B.I.F.R v. KMA Limited

Company Application No. 498 of 2010S KATHAWALLA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Arvind Kulkarni, Representative of Applicant, present. Ms. Apoorva Kaiwar, for Kamani Employees’ Union. Deputy Official Liquidator, present. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER 2010. P.C. By this Company Application, the Applicant has sought direction against the Official Liquidator to adjudicate, declare and pay the dividend under section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956 to the Applicant-workman of KMA Limited (Company in liquidation) by fixing a peremptory date of payment.

2.

The Official Liquidator informs the Court that since there is no unanimity qua the basis on which the adjudication should be carried out, he will be submitting his report before this Court 2 ca-498-10-cp-778-05 within two weeks from today, seeking necessary directions qua the basis of adjudication and payment of dividend.

3.

In view thereof, the Company Application stands

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 14 Oct 2010. The bench was S KATHAWALLA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Company Application No. 498 of 2010). ← Search more judgments