✦ Bombay High Court · 07 Aug 2009

The Commissioner of Sales Tax v. M/s Adani Exports Ltd

Tax Application No. 88 of 2008D G KARNIK, F I REBELLO

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The application is disposed of accordingly

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The application is disposed of accordingly. (D.G. KARNIK, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Judgment

Mr. J.S. Saluja, A.G.P. For the applicant. Mr. A.S. Murthi i/b Mr. Vikram Nankani for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 7TH AUGUST 2009 P.C. :

1.

The applicant is directed to make a reference to this Court on the following questions:- (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal is justified in law in setting aside the determination of disputed questions order dated 24-10-2003 passed under Section 52 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 by 2 the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Mumbai, and allowing the claim of sale dated 28-7-2000 of 250 M. Tonnes of Palm oil effected to M/s.Godrej Foods Limited covered by bulk import by ship and which were in unascertained stage till the clearance from customs as sale in course of import by transfer of document of title to the goods within the meaning of Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with Section 75 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and hence not liable to tax under the B.S.T. Act, 1959 ? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 particularly Section 18 of the said Act is not applicable to transaction in dispute ?

2.

The reference be forwarded to this Court within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Operative part

3.

The application is disposed of accordingly. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)

(F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — ss. 52, 75; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 — s. 5(2); Sale of Goods Act, 1930.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 07 Aug 2009. The bench was D G KARNIK, F I REBELLO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Tax Application No. 88 of 2008). ← Search more judgments