Civil Reference No. 02 of 2005 · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 s. 61(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. None for the Petitioner. The office noting shows that this Application/Reference is governed by section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The office noting shows that in view of Rule 711 of Chapter XXXIX of the High Court Original Side Rules, this…
Judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REFERENCE NO.02 OF 2005 CIVIL REFERENCE NO.02 OF 2005 CIVIL REFERENCE NO.02 OF 2005 CIVIL .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Court’s or Judge’s orders. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : APRIL 18, 2007. DATED : APRIL 18, 2007. DATED : APRIL 18, 2007. DATED P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
None for the Petitioner. The office noting shows that this Application/Reference is governed by section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The office noting shows that in view of Rule 711 of Chapter XXXIX of the High Court Original Side Rules, this reference pertains to the original side of this High Court. Accordingly, the reference is transferred to the original side of this Court. Steps shall be taken for placing the reference before the appropriate bench. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — s. 61(1).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Apr 2007. The bench was ABHAY S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.