Hotel Ruturaj v. State Bank of India
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Aug 2011
- Bench
- A A SAYED, D Y CHANDRACHUD
Outcome
Dismissed
The Writ Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The Writ Petition is dismissed. (A. A. SAYED, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1155 OF 2011 Hotel Ruturaj Versus State Bank of India ....Petitioner ....Respondent ____________ Mr. B. V. Kargutkar, owner of Petitioner present. Mr. Atul G. Damle for the Respondent. CORAM: DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD & A. A. SAYED, J.J. DATED : AUGUST 29, 2011. P.C.: Against the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal dated 31 January 2011, (Exhibit-A), an Appeal lies before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. In the circumstances, we decline to exercise our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and relegate the Petitioner to the remedy of an appeal.
Operative part
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 29 Aug 2011. The bench was A A SAYED, D Y CHANDRACHUD.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.