Sophia Prashant Sawant v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 02 Mar 2009
- Bench
- V K TAHILRAMANI, N PATEL
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. In view of the fact that Writ Petition is disposed of, Chamber Summons has become infructous and is dismissed as infructous. [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.88 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.474 OF 2008 Sophia Prashant Sawant and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents .... None appears for Petitioners Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar for Respondent-B.M.C. .... CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : MARCH 2, 2009 DATE : MARCH 2, 2009 DATE : MARCH 2, 2009 P.C.P.C. P.C.
In view of the fact that Writ Petition is disposed of, Chamber Summons has become infructous and is dismissed as infructous. [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 02 Mar 2009. The bench was V K TAHILRAMANI, N PATEL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.