Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The Company Scheme Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and
Provisions considered
- Companies Act, 2013 ss. 391(1), 394
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The Company Scheme Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO.279 OF 2011 CONNECTED WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.135 OF 2011 In the matter of Companies Act, 1956; And In the matter of Section 391(1) to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; And In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Impact Containers Pvt. Ltd., a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at Patel Vanika, Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai – 400 063; With Patcart Packaging Pvt. Ltd., a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at Patel Vanika, Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai – 400 063; Patcart Packaging Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner Mr. Viral P. Amin, i/b. M/s. B. Amin & Co., for the Petitioner. Mrs. Rupa L. Sutar, A.O.L., for the Official Liquidator, is present in person. *2* CSP-279-11.sxw Mr. C.J. Joy with Mr. D.A. Dubey, i/b. Mr. H.P. Chaturvedi, for the Regional Director. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 9 th December, 2011. P.C. :
The learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant/Petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this Company Scheme Petition.
Operative part
The Company Scheme Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
There will be no order as to costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Company Scheme Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013 — ss. 391(1), 394.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.