✦ Bombay High Court

Serum Institute of India Ltd v. Mr.Inderjit Properties Pvt.Ltd

Judgment

Mr.Inderjit Properties Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent ----- Shri.V.P.Sawant for the Applicant Sou.V.Advani i/b. Law Charter & Associates for the Respondent. : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &&& CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant learned Counsel Respondent. By Notice Motion, Applicant seeking condonation 44 delay. Perused Notice of Motion affidavit-in-support thereof. For reasons stated affidavit-in-support Notice Motion, sufficient condoning delay. There inaction, negligence bonafide Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Company Appeal No. 27 of 2005). ← Search more judgments