V/s v. Intech Polymers Ltd & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S RADHAKRISHNAN, S VAZIFDAR
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By appeal, Appellant challenging learned Single Judge 23rd December, whereby Appellant restrained manufacturing Organic Titanates. It appears during pendency appeal, Expert 2004 appointed a Commissioner Commissioner Shri. Ravi Marphatia submitted a detailed report indicating Polygel i.e. Appellant…
Judgment
Shri. Darius Kakalia i/b. Mulla & Mulla for the Appellant. Ms.Leena Adhvarya i/b. P.M. & M.Co.for Respondent No.1 CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &&& CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : 20TH MARCH, 2006. : 20TH MARCH, 2006. : 20TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By appeal, Appellant challenging learned Single Judge 23rd December, whereby Appellant restrained manufacturing Organic Titanates. It appears during pendency appeal, Expert 2004 appointed a Commissioner Commissioner Shri. Ravi Marphatia submitted a detailed report indicating Polygel i.e. Appellant herein secrets manufacturing Organo Titanates Intec personnel developed :2: expert guidance leading technical consultants published patents. The learned Counsel appearing behalf Original Plaintif-Respondent No.1 herein states Plaintiffs accepting report purpose appeal. In thereof, consent, interim passed learned single Judge 23rd December, 2004 aside. In aforesaid consent, the appeal is accordingly allowed however with no order as to costs. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)
(S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.