✦ Bombay High Court

Shivajirao V.Nalawde v. Chandrakant Mukutrao Khopde & Ors.

S RADHAKRISHNAN, S VAZIFDAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 1313. After hearing parties time, learned Counsel Respondent No.1 - Shri. Sawant, Senior Counsel fairly conceded that the original :2: petition should Civi Appellate Side Article 227 Constituion India whereas appears erroneously Original Side mentioning Article 226 227 Constitution India. In thereof impugned 19th December…

Judgment

Shri.Y.S.Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate with Shri.S.S.Redekar for the Appellant Shri.C.J.Sawant, Senior Advocate with Shri.A.S.Desai for Respondent No.1. Shri.R.M.Sawant for Respondent Nos.2 to 4, 12 & 13. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &&& CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant learned Counsel Respondent No.1 learned Government Pleader Respondent Nos.2 4, 12

13.

After hearing parties time, learned Counsel Respondent No.1 - Shri. Sawant, Senior Counsel fairly conceded that the original :2: petition should Civi Appellate Side Article 227 Constituion India whereas appears erroneously Original Side mentioning Article 226 227 Constitution India. In thereof impugned 19th December, 2005 passed learned Single Judge stands aside. However, Writ Petition Respondent No.1 Original Side stands transferred Civil Appellate Side placed before appropriate Bench admission. The Appellate office directed a number petition, transferred Civil Appellate Side. Respondent No.1 liberty to carry out the consequential amendments in view of the above order. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)

(S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments