✦ Bombay High Court · 27 Jun 2007

A. S. Sharma v. State of Maharashtra

Criminal Application No. 1391 of 2006NISHITA MHATRE, D G DESHPANDE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Application is allowed and

Provisions considered

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Key paragraphs

Para 22. This is an application for condonation of delay of 297 days in filing the Appeal, through jail. Applicant / accused is convicted for life. Delay is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of.

Read the judgment Go to the operative part Find similar cases

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1391 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1391 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1391 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1359 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1359 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1359 OF 2006 A. S. Sharma ..Appellant versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr. A. G. Toraskar, Advocate Appointed for the Appellant. Mr. A. S. Shitole APP for the Respondents - State. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007. DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007. DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007. P.C.P.C. P.C.

Heard.

Operative part

This is an application for condonation of delay of 297 days in filing the Appeal, through jail. Applicant / accused is convicted for life. Delay is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of.

Appeal admitted. :2: (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)

(D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is allowed and

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 27 Jun 2007. The bench was NISHITA MHATRE, D G DESHPANDE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 1391 of 2006). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

What did the Court decide in this case?

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Which court decided this case, and when?

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

More cases under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Continue researching