✦ Bombay High Court · 08 Sep 2010

Judgment · High Court · 2010

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.196 OF 1999 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's order or Directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.V.P. Vaidya for Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. DATED: 08.09.2010 P.C.: Mr.Vaidya, appearing for the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition since a settlement u/s 2 (p) of the Industrial Disputes Act has been arrived at between the Petitioner and Respondent No.1.

#2. Writ petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — s. 2(p).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 08 Sep 2010. The bench was NISHITA MHATRE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 196 of 1999). ← Search more judgments