Judgment · High Court · 2008
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The learned Counsel appearing for the State submits that they will look into the matter and take action in accordance with law as may be deemed fit by the concerned authority. In view of this statement, nothing survives in this Petition. Petition is accordingly…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PIL NO.19 OF 2008 Mrs. Shamim Nafiz Shaikh ....... Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra ------ Ms. Jamila Shaikh for the Petitioner. ....... Respondent. Mr. P.M. Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondents - State. ------ CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND V.M.KANADE, J. DATE : 3RD JULY, 2008. P.C.:
With the consent of the parties, the Writ Petition having been restored is taken up for final hearing.
The learned Counsel appearing for the State submits that they will look into the matter and take action in accordance with law as may be deemed fit by the concerned authority. In view of this statement, nothing survives in this Petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Respondents - State shall abide by their statement. CHIEF JUSTICE 2 V.M. KANADE, J.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.