✦ Bombay High Court

Mr. Ramesh Nandlal Jeswani v. State of Maharashtra

Criminal Application No. 1485 of 2009V M KANADE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Application is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Judgment

Mr. Ramesh Nandlal Jeswani .... Applicant. V/s State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent. Mr. Ganesh Gole for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 31 st March, 2009 P.C:-

1.

Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the learned APP for the State.

2.

This is an application for bail. Applicant has been arrested in connection with the offence punishable under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 177, 182 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Applicant was arrested on 27/02/2009 and he was remanded to magisterial custody. No application has been made by the prosecution for interrogation in police custody. All the documents have been seized.

3.

Under these circumstances, in my view, continued detention of the applicant is not necessary. Applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.I-65 of 2009 in the sum of 2 Rs 5000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. He shall report to the concerned Police Station once in a week till filing of the charge- sheet and, thereafter, as and when called. Applicant shall co-operate with the investigating agency.

Operative part

4.

Application is disposed of.

(V.M. KANADE, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 177, 182, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 1485 of 2009). ← Search more judgments