✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Jun 2026

Through Its Director K. Rathnakar v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Wp No. 3400 of 2016RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE

Case at a glance

Order date
25 Jun 2026
Bench
RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE

Judgment

None for the Petitioners. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis ‘B’ Pannel Counsel, for Respondent-State. **** **** CORAM : RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J. DATE : 25th JUNE 2026 P.C.:

2.

When the matter is called out, none appears for the Petitioners. Record indicates that, since 7 February 2017, the Petitioners and/or his Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

3.

It appears that, the Petitioners is not interested in pursuing the Petition.

4.

Dismissed for non-prosecution. ( RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) Sharada 1

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wp No. 3400 of 2016). ← Search more judgments