Umesh Arvind Mistry v. Chaitrali Umesh Mistry
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 15 Sep 2022
- Bench
- M S KARNIK
Outcome
Dismissed
liberty open, the petition is dismissed
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In the event the proceedings before the Family Court are restored, liberty to apply to the petitioner for restoring this petition. Keeping this liberty open, the petition is dismissed. [M.S. KARNIK, J.]
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10853 OF 2022 Umesh Arvind Mistry ..Petitioner Vs. Chaitrali Umesh Mistry ...Respondent ----- Mr. Pandit Kasar for Petitioner. Mr. Anand Shalgaonkar i/b. Mr. Vishal Tated for Respondent. ----- CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2022. P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent pointed out that the main proceedings before the Family Court, Pune stand dismissed as the petitioner-husband failed to deposit the arrears as directed by the Family Court. The present petition arises out of an interim order of maintenance granted by the Family Court. Consequent to the dismissal of the divorce petition before the Family Court, the question of considering the challenge in this petition to the interim order passed by the Family Court now does not arise.
Operative part
In the event the proceedings before the Family Court are restored, liberty to apply to the petitioner for restoring this petition. Keeping this liberty open, the petition is dismissed.
[M.S. KARNIK, J.]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: liberty open, the petition is dismissed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 15 Sep 2022. The bench was M S KARNIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.