Gurpreet Singh Algh v. Housing Development Finance Corporation Bank Ltd
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N R BORKAR, M S KARNIK
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Review petition is rejected. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) PSL 1 of 1
Judgment
1.
Heard the petitioner in-person.
2.
The petitioner makes a grievance that he was not given an adequate opportunity to argue the review petition. He therefore submitted the written notes of arguments on record.
3.
The petitioner wants us to virtually rehear the writ petition by contending that this Court has committed an error apparent on the face of record. We do not find any error apparent on the face of record. Hence, we are not inclined to interfere in the exercise of review jurisdiction of this Court.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Rpw No. 62 of 2025).
← Search more judgments