Shri John Gebral Fernandis v. Maria
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 13 Jan 2006
- Bench
- R M LODHA, S R SATHE, ANOOP V MOHTA, ANOOP
Provisions considered
- Family Courts Act, 1984 s. 19
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Reference is disposed of accordingly. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. SATHE, J.) (S.R. SATHE, J.) (S.R. SATHE, J.) (S.R. V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP
Judgment
Shri John Gebral Fernandis .. Respondent CORAM : R.M.LODHA, S.R.SATHE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 13th January, 2006 P.C. None appears for the parties.
In decision Reference No.1 1998, Asis Ubaldo Rodrigues Civil v. Maria Asis Rodrigues, reference Family Court No.1, Pune uncalled unnecessary. The decree January, 1996 passed Family Court 30th No.1, Pune treated a decree subject appeal under section 19 of the Family Courts Act,
Reference is disposed of accordingly. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. SATHE, J.) (S.R. SATHE, J.) (S.R. SATHE, J.) (S.R. V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Family Courts Act, 1984 — s. 19.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Jan 2006. The bench was R M LODHA, S R SATHE, ANOOP V MOHTA, ANOOP.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.