Kanhaiya Kumar v. Chandani Devi
Case at a glance
- Bench
- P B BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA
Provisions considered
- Family Courts Act, 1984 s. 19(4)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 125
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 410 of 2023 stands dismissed as it is not maintainable, reserving liberty to the appellant to invoke appropriate remedy. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Arun Kumar Jha, J) abhishekkr/- U
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA Mr. : : ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 2 31-08-2023 None appears for the appellant.
The present Miscellaneous Appeal is not maintainable as under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 only a criminal revision would lie against an order passed by the Family Court under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Thus, the appellant has remedy of filing criminal revision in the light of our earlier order passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 237 of 2020 decided on 24.06.2023.
Accordingly, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 410 of 2023 stands dismissed as it is not maintainable, reserving liberty to the appellant to invoke appropriate remedy. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Arun Kumar Jha, J) abhishekkr/- U
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.