✦ Bombay High Court · 04 Dec 2006

Criminal Application No. 358 of 2006 · Bombay High Court

Criminal Application No. 358 of 2006S R SATHE, S B MHASE

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Dec 2006
Bench
S R SATHE, S B MHASE

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. We have perused the order dated 23rd August 2006. 15 days time was granted in August 2006 to approach the Court at Rajasthan. That time is over long back and, therefore, it will be inappropriate to extend the said time after a period of…

Judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2006. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1455 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 1455 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 1455 OF 2006. --------------------------------l------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda l of Coram, appearances, Court’s l Orders or directions and l Registrar’s orders. l Court’s or Judges’ Order --------------------------------i------------------------------ Seema Gupta h/f A. M. Sarogi for the petitioner. I. S. Thakur A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE, JJ CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE, JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE, JJ DATE: December 4, 2006. DATE: December 4, 2006. DATE: December 4, 2006. P.C. P.C.P.C.

1.

We have perused the order dated 23rd August 2006. 15 days time was granted in August 2006 to approach the Court at Rajasthan. That time is over long back and, therefore, it will be inappropriate to extend the said time after a period of four months. Application is rejected. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) :sachin/2006/sathe/..

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 04 Dec 2006. The bench was S R SATHE, S B MHASE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 358 of 2006). ← Search more judgments