Writ Petition No. 2561 of 2007 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that alternate remedy by way of appeal is available to the petitioner. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition to follow appropriate efficacious remedy. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for.…
Judgment
1.
Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that alternate remedy by way of appeal is available to the petitioner. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition to follow appropriate efficacious remedy. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. Petition stands disposed of. (D.G.KARNIK,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK,J.)
(S.B.MHASE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Jul 2007. The bench was D G KARNIK, S B MHASE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2561 of 2007).
← Search more judgments