Prafulla Himmatsing Pardeshi v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. S.R. Page for the Petitioner Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos.1,2 and 4. REBELLO & CORAM : : : F.I.F.I.F.I. REBELLO & CORAM REBELLO & CORAM JJ. R.M.SAWANT, JJ. R.M.SAWANT, JJ. R.M.SAWANT, : 6TH MARCH, 2007. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007 DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007 DATED Rule. The petitioner has been admitted and P.C.P.C.P.C. . prosecuting studies. He produce certificate within 12 weeks, mandatory directory. Under circumstances respondent NO.2 directed dispose petitioner’s application 12 today. The petitioner a respondent NO.4. absolute accordingly. During pendency Rule disposal of the caste claim of the petitioner the petitioner’s admission should not be cancelled. F.I.REBELLO, J) (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAWANT,J.) (R.M.SAWANT,J R.M.SAWANT,J
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Mar 2007. The bench was F I REBELLO, R M SAWANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.