PETITION NO.5979 of 2006 v. Co-op.Societies, Kolhapur & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In petition present maintainable. However, enable petitioner approach Court considering ad-interim relief 7th September, 2006, granted prayer clauses (c) (d) continue a period weeks. With observation petition stands disposed of. Needless to say that it is always open to the respondent No.4 to challenge…
Judgment
appointment Administrator required challenged person affected order, respondent No.4
In petition present maintainable. However, enable petitioner approach Court considering ad-interim relief 7th September, 2006, granted prayer clauses (c) (d) continue a period weeks. With observation petition stands disposed of. Needless to say that it is always open to the respondent No.4 to challenge the same order. F.I.REBELLO, J) (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAWANT,J.) (R.M.SAWANT,J R.M.SAWANT,J
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Mar 2007. The bench was R M SAWANT, F I REBELLO, F I REBELLO R M SAWANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.