PETITION NO.6278 of 2006 PETITION NO.6278 of 2006 Shri Rajaram Shankar Patil v. District Collector, Sangli & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
observation petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. All transfers will be subject to the Rules in force. However, considering representation petitioner Respondent No.2 petitioner appropriate orders according law. With observation petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. F.I.REBELLO, J) (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAVANT,J.) (R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J
Judgment
Mr.Umesh Mankapure i/b. M/s.Shekhar & Co., for the petitioners Mr. R.D.Rane, Govt. Pleader for Respondents. P.C.P.C.P.C. REBELLO & CORAM : : : F.I.F.I.F.I. REBELLO & CORAM REBELLO & CORAM JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, : 6TH MARCH, 2007. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007 DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007 DATED . Rule. Heard forthwith. The petitioner is seeking transfer allotted favour Shri J.D. Mulik. That transfer subject certain conditions. The petitioner various representations, 25th April, 2005 expressing certain apprehension subsequent transfer. The petitioner is that he has not heard anything from the respondents on his representations.
Operative part
All transfers will be subject to the Rules in force. However, considering representation petitioner Respondent No.2 petitioner appropriate orders according law. With observation petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. F.I.REBELLO, J) (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAVANT,J.) (R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: observation petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.