Hutatma Kisan Ahir Sahakari Sakhar v. Shri Suresh Balu Zende

i.e. allowing Written Statement a record conditionally. The condition imposed by the Inudstrial Court is to deposit 40% towards in the Court as condition precedent. . In the order below Exhibit U-2 passed on 9/11/2001 learned Member Industrial Court observed complaints workmen alleged employees 2 40% complainants rate. Therefore, Industrial Court directed deposit due amount of bonus payable to the complainants at par with other employees o or before 30/11/2001. . The Karkhana went on seeking dates purportedly settling dispute amicably almost Exhibit U-2 passed Written Statement and, therefore, 6/12/2005 Industrial Court passed W.S. Karkhana application Exhibit C-8 or about 13/4/2006 and the said application has been allowed but conditionally. . On the face of these obtaining circumstances particularly complainant’s employees 40% salary, condition imposed learned Member Industrial Court impugned cannot either perverse palpably erroneous interference Article 227 Constitution. Hence petitions rejected summarily clarified deposited amount 3 allowed withdrawn complainants during pendency complaints. Trial complaints hereby expedited. If petitioner Written Statement within today, no WS will provided the condition laid down by the Industrial Court is complied with within that period. . Certified copy is expedited. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)